
Legislative Roundup
San Antonio Express-News
05/07/2003
Moment of silence bill passes House
House Bill 793, by Rep. Dan Branch, R-Dallas, would require students
to "reflect, pray, meditate or engage in any other silent activity
that is not likely to interfere with or distract another student."
The bill
also requires students to pledge allegiance to the
The legislation,
already passed by the Senate, now goes to Gov. Rick Perry to sign it in
to law, veto it or allow it to become law without signing it.
Voting
against the bill were Rep. Suzanna Gratia Hupp, R-Lampasas; Rep.
Lon Burnam, D-Fort Worth; Rep. Eddie Rodriguez,
D-Austin; and Rep. Elvira Reyna, R-Mesquite.
Ethics
legislation due more scrutiny
As passed
out of committee, House Bill 1606 wouldn't have allowed legislators to vote
on bills that directly affect their financial interests, would have beefed
up electronic filing of campaign contributions and required more disclosure
from lawmakers.
HB 1606
was supposed to reach the House floor last week but opponents forced the
delay, citing provisions to curb conflicts of interest and limit a practice
called "continuance," which legislator lawyers use to postpone
trials.
A House
ethics committee appointed by Republican Speaker Tom Craddick approved the
bill last month after a series of public hearings. But the changes made
of late have come behind closed doors as lawmakers tinkered with the bill.
Contingency
fee measure defeated
Contingency
fees generally are payments to lawyers based on a percentage of the monetary
award in lawsuit.
House members
rejected the measure 86-18. Several legislators said they don't want to
tell school districts and county and city governments how to conduct their
business.
"I
think it's definitely a Big Brother bill," said Rep. Ruth Jones McClendon,
D-San Antonio.
Rep. Robert
Talton, R-Pasadena, said it was an attempt at
"micromanaging" local officials.
Some legislators
said local governments already can avoid contingency fee contracts if they
wish.
Nixon said
the measure, which would have lawyers paid based on an hourly rate, was
intended to be something of an "ethics bill" to prevent extraordinarily
high legal fees.
Compiled
from wire reports